Picasso: Marie-Therese

Picasso: Marie-Therese
Pablo Picasso
9 in. x 12 in.

Buy This at Allposters.com

The attraction exercised by blue on Picasso’s imagination lasted until the beginning of 1904. It was so obsessive that when he had to pay his tailor Soler with a portrait-was the Barcelona equivalent of the pastry-cook Murer who used to feed Pissarro and Renoir-he Plunged him into an indigo darkness which did not fail to enhance the melancholy and the innate distinction of that excellent man. This Portrait of Soler (1903) as well as that of the poet Sabartès (1901), now also in Moscow, attest to Picasso’s fundamental romanticism which he will often suppress, especially in his later portraits.

In 1904 and 1905, when he has settled down in Paris for good, Picasso gradually abandons monochrome, the lengthened proportions, and the precious arabesque of gesture. To the blues are now added ochers and pinks; there appear new themes: traveling showmen, acrobats, and their daily life. The melancholy, the poignant solitude of the figures persist for some time. In the Boy with Dog the boy, as famished as his animal friend, roams in a suburban landscape; his nostalgia is lit by a fragile blue light which envelops him on all sides.

The tone brightens, however, and the Girl on a Ball (1905), perhaps one of the last in the series of mountebank scenes, could have appealed to Morosov by its tender symphony of pinks and blues. It is also one of the finest in the series. In the opposition between the brute force of the athlete and the aerial gracefulness of the girl there is the naïveté of a street song. Picasso will always have the knack of extracting from life this essential and fresh note, the fundamental truth of a body, of an attitude, of an expression; how can one forget the exquisite uncertainty of the slender arms groping for support in the air, how can one fail to be struck by this back, muscular and vast, rugged like a dream landscape, the back of an ignudo by Michelangelo or Rosso? Which masters have surpassed the sensitive assurance of outline, the triumphant fancy in the modeling?

This silhouette of a Roman wrestler at rest announces a new spirit in Picasso’s art: a world of the sun, of impassive certitude, of a flourishing physical life replaces the crepuscular and nostalgic limbo. For Picasso’s Latinism the attraction of Mediterranean classicism will prove as irresistible, in these years, as later. His “classical” period will also be his “pink” period. The Nude Boy (1905), this gladiator’s apprentice, comes from a race quite different from that of the little mountebank with the dog; and to the Woman of Majorca (1905), daughter of the Greeks and the Phoenicians, the melancholy of traveling showmen is entirely foreign.

We are in the heart of the Mediterranean, in the midst of a frenzy of ochers and blues; the drawing, the modeling carry memories of the spontaneous suppleness of Pompeian frescoes and the elegance of Alexandrian terra cottas. However, if the style betrays these reminiscences, they serve to endow the figures with an unsuspected youth, for there can be nothing less faithful to the classical canon than the body of this boy with its heavy legs and sinewy arms, nothing less tanagra-like than this translucid apparition traversed by tempestuous shadows.

Continue Reading >

Delaunay: Rhythm, 1946

Delaunay: Rhythm, 1946
Sonia Delaunay
9 in. x 12 in.

Buy This at Allposters.com

Cubism, the first of the three great innovating movements in twentieth-century art, begins in 1907 with Picasso Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and ends, some say, about 1921. Actually cubist principles and devices continue down to the present in the art of such masters as Picasso and Braque. Under the above heading, The Cubist Generation in Paris, are grouped their works early and late, cubist and non-cubist, together with those of their major colleagues, Gris, Léger, Lipchitz and others, lesser or more marginal. A few — Duchamp, Malevich, Mondrian, Rivera — who left the movement to help generate other revolutions.

Moscow is far richer in Picasso’s Blue, Rose, and “Negro” periods (though long hidden. from public view as subversively “formalist”); Basel probably surpasses us in analytical cubism, Philadelphia in cubist collages, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum here in New York, in paintings by Delaunay, Gleizes and Metzinger; and the Paris Musée d’Art Moderne in the work of the past decade in which the Museum is deficient. Nevertheless the cubist generation, by and large, is more comprehensively represented in the Museum of Modern Art than in any other public collection in the world.

Of these riches, because of limitations of space and color plates, can offer only a sampling: for instance, two of eight oils by Braque, two of ten by Léger, eight of sixteen by Picasso, two of eight by Gris, three of eight sculptures by Lipchitz.

In 1904 Picasso was living in an ancient wooden tenement on Montmartre among poverty-stricken poets, actors, clerks and laundresses. A little earlier, he himself had known starvation so that the Frugal Repast is based on firsthand experience.

Avoiding sentimentality which had softened some of his “Blue” canvases he draws the woman and her blind companion with their wine and crust of bread. Their emaciation seems appropriate but it is largely a matter of mannered style, and so is the elaborately studied composition of the hands (which may be compared to Kokoschka’s, opposite).

Picasso was twenty-two at the time and the Frugal Repast, technically a tour de force, was his first major etching. It remained perhaps his greatest, certainly his most ambitious, print until the Minotauromachy of 1935.

Possibly the mannered attenuations of Picasso Frugal Repast were inspired by El Greco. In any case, two years later on a summer’s trip to Spain in 1906 Picasso renewed an early enthusiasm for the great sixteenth-century Mannerist. During the same year Picasso had been stirred by Spanish art of a much earlier period, pre-Christian “Iberian” sculpture; and he had been deeply impressed by the memorial exhibition of Cézanne’s work.

Picasso and Matisse had already met at Leo and Gertrude Stein’s apartment and were beginning to feel that rivalry, alternately friendly and jealous but always implicitly flattering, which they were to maintain for decades. Matisse had shown his very large and controversial Joy of Life at the Salon des Indépendants in the spring of 1906, an event which may well have excited Picasso to emulation. In any event, Leo Stein (who was the first to see that they were the two foremost painters of our time) remembers visiting Picasso’s studio that fall and finding there a huge canvas which, before he had painted a stroke, the artist had had expensively lined as if it were already a classic work. Picasso was marshaling his creative energies for a great effort.

For months that winter Picasso worked on dozens of figure and composition studies. In the spring of 1907 he began to paint. The picture was probably finished by autumn but it was given no name for a dozen years thereafter. About 1920 a literary friend of Picasso christened it with the romantic title Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, an ironic reference to the “damsels” of a house on Avignon Street in Barcelona.

Continue Reading >

Brooklyn Bridge Photographic Print

Brooklyn Bridge Photographic Print
Cameron Davidson
12 in. x 9 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

It is to be regretted that more American painters have not chosen the subject matter of their pictures from the contemporary movement of life especially in New York. In this respect, John Sloan is rather a solitary figure,” Albert E. Gallatin wrote in 1925, in a monograph on John Sloan. “The infinitely varied life of New York offers as wide a field of exploration as did the Paris of Gavarni, who in his Physionomie de la Population de Paris gave us… a judgment of the entire epoch, the conventions, the fashions and all the types that go to make up the population.”

In the relatively short time that has elapsed since 1925 America has come into the possession of a voluminous native subject art. We have an exhaustive summation of our own epoch in terms not only of New York City’s teeming life, but of the life of Pittsburgh, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Los Angeles, and the rural regions of the Midwest, the Dust Bowl and the flood and tornado areas, the agricultural far South, Alaska, and the Virgin Islands. This could not have come about without the unprecedented art activities in America from the beginning of the century to 1925. But the scope and the character of the painting itself are to be accounted for to a large extent by extraordinary conditions in the national life.

Fabulous all-time spending records were being piled up in the United States, including public expenditures for art. In the year 1928 alone, for instance, American art investments totaled a billion dollars. This meant, among other things, unheard-of opportunities for American painters, mature, immature, and uneducated.

An impulse had arisen attracting artists to fresh, native American sources and to a spontaneous painting style in the tradition of the untaught realists of earlier days. Outpourings of lighthearted pictures, amusing or pathetic, followed; literary and sentimental pictures or mere illustrations, many of them presented with artistically correct detail, all of them made to sell. Most of this subject art was offered to the public as a gesture of revolt against imported French art and modern conceptions of plastic construction. After 1929, when an atmosphere of social catastrophe descended over public life and when the artist, in common with other workers, had little continuing market except as it was provided presently by the government under emergency conditions, the mood and the character of the subject can be seen to have changed.

The spectator must, accordingly, find his way about among contemporary paintings amid confusions not only of precedent and tradition, but also of social values and inspirations so complex that they constantly threaten to dissolve into a state of chaos. “American Scene” art at its inception represented the frank intention of its makers to produce a fresh, spontaneous illustrational expression. Their concern was not primarily plastic, but was rather the concern of individual romantic realists, unsympathetic towards official art as well as modern art. Almost simultaneously with it there arose painting representing the workers’ struggle for power. It was at first a small effort, essentially communistic and revolutionary. The two movements went far beyond the initial intentions of their sponsors when they reached, together, a sort of climax of popular appeal around 1935, representing opposing and antagonistic ideas of American life. Since that time the gap between popular art of everyday life and art with a social purpose has tended to become smaller.

Continue Reading >

Summer Evening Art Print

Summer Evening Art Print
Edward Hopper
12 in. x 9 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

Contemporary art in America is represented by a body of painting and sculpture greater than that of any other country in the world; it shows evidences of sound craftsmanship; and, more significantly, it is alive and creative. If the statement sounds controversial and exaggerated, it is because of the revolutionary state of all creative effort and the current confusions about what is art; and because of the confusions and revolutions in every aspect of the national and international life from which art draws its substance and its character.

Until the end of the nineteenth century, no claim was made for an independent American art; that is, for an art that expressed the spirit of New World life and at the same time satisfied the prevailing technical requirements of international critics. Our artists were European educated, and our Academy drew its authority unquestioningly from European officialdom, at a time when all official art in Europe was in a state of unprecedented anemia. We have only to look at today’s situation in perspective against the stagnant backwashes of late nineteenth-century American eclecticism to appreciate the contrast. Today’s artist is independent. He may get his education exclusively in America. He is free to make a profession of painting or sculpture, and to express himself with all the originality and force he possesses in either field. Even more than the poet, the playwright, the novelist, he makes himself sensitive to the changing spirit of his age.

We may have no genius of the first rank in world art. We have no “school” of the kind that men from Charles Willson Peale to Arthur B. Davies foresaw. We have not even the beginnings of a new American tradition. But we have sensitive and mature painters, and a few sculptors. We have generations of young men who are filled with selffaith, and faith in America’s cultural destiny–however variously they may visualize that destiny in the terms of their own temperament, artistic inheritance, or racial background. Our art is still formative. It is, however, no longer concentrated in one small area in the North Atlantic states, but has representation in every geographical area of the country, as recent surveys and “samplings” have shown. It is no longer exclusive in practice; the art of the “forgotten man” and of the untaught having its place wherever widely representative showings are held.

It is not by this permeative activity that we recognize it as American, however, any more than we accept it as modern because of the chaos and the anarchy that are still observable in it after over a quarter of a century. The conventional technical practices of nineteenth-century studios are in process of final rejection–the end products of the exhausted Renaissance period. Imitation and the reproduction of the surface semblances of things have reached their final perfection (and their final futility); and a more direct re-presentation of things themselves is sought. The artist, imaginatively moved by experiences that are new to his time and his place, again becomes the interpreter of the age.

Young men, as we near the nineteen forties, turn again in large numbers to abstract art, to pick up clues from Cézanne or the early and most creative Cubists, convinced that all art must return to its sources and must painstakingly evolve a new plastic language for experiences that cannot be conveyed by the technical means evolved in Florentine and Venetian studios of the quattrocento for kingly pageants and for the heavenly hierarchies of angels and cherubim, and God Himself enthroned.

At the other extreme from the abstractionists, there are artists who feel the necessity of showing the psychological conflicts, not of the masses, but of man, with the instrument of a new order in his hands.

There are no hard and fast groups nor clean-cut divisions in the varieties of effort that are observable everywhere. Men of opposing principles often exhibit together, and in most of the important annual exhibitions on a national scale, representation is cross-sectional. This means that the exceptional artist or art student is still largely left to arrive at his own definitions and make his alliances independently, and that therefore his achievement is the more notable when he arrives at recognition.

The extent to which our critical values remain unclarified–and the extent therefore of the individual artist’s necessity for making his own way–is seen in the acquisition policies of the museums. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, in New York, for instance, the leading institution of its kind in America and one of the foremost of the world, within a short period acquired Watteau’s Le Mezzetin (at a reported cost of $250,000) and one of the Walt Disney paintings on celluloid from the motion-picture sequence for Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. Of the creator of Mickey Mouse, the Three Little Pigs, and Donald Duck, Harry B. Wehle, curator of painting of this institution, said: “I think he is a great historical figure in the development of American art.”

The spirit of rebellion that was beginning to appear in American art at the opening of the century assumed the scope of a revolution on the occasion of that now historic event, the Armory Show (officially the International Exposition of Modern Art). The pine tree of the American Revolution, adopted as the Show’s emblem, became, even beyond the expectation of the sponsors, a badge of independence from the authority of outmoded academic practices and restrictions.

Continue Reading >

My Complex Heart Art Print

My Complex Heart Art Print
Lorraine Christie
36 in. x 26 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

my complex heart, lorraine christie artworks, urban landscapes, decorative art prints, contemporary art, figurative art prints

Group Gyrations II Art Print

Group Gyrations II Art Print
Alfred Gockel
39 in. x 28 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

group gyrations art print, alfred gockel artworks, abstract art prints, multicolored abstract, contemporary art, abstract figures

First Kiss Art Print

First Kiss Art Print
Rob Hefferan
37 in. x 27 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

first kiss art print, romance posters, couples posters, decorate your cafe, decorate your bar, bar decorating, cafe posters, rob hefferan art prints, realistic figures, figurative art prints

La Boheme Art Print

La Boheme Art Print
Rafal Olbinski
24 in. x 37 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

la boheme art print, la boheme poster, erotic art prints, figurative art prints, rafal olbinski artworks, decorative art prints

Jazz for Lovers Premium Giclee Print

Jazz for Lovers Premium Giclee Print
Maya Green
9 in. x 12 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

jazz for lovers art print, premium giclee prints, music posters, jazz posters, maya green artworks, figurative art prints

A Walk in the Park Art Print

A Walk in the Park Art Print
Aimee Wilson
35 in. x 35 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

a walk in the park art print, landscape paintings, urban landscapes, couples posters, best sellers, decorative art prints

American Storytellers Art Print

American Storytellers Art Print
Andy Thomas
17 in. x 13 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

american storytellers, political humor posters, humor posters, american presidents, figurative art prints, ronald reagan posters, americana posters, buffalo bill posters

The Red Rose Art Print

The Red Rose Art Print
Chujian Ou
36 in. x 27 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

the red rose art print, figurative art prints, erotic art prints, decorative art prints, contemporary art, asian influence, chinenese erotic art, chujian ou artworks

Teller Of Tales

Teller Of Tales
Martin Grelle
13 in. x 12 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

teller of tales, teller of tales art print, landscape painting, decorative art prints, native art, figurative art prints, western theme posters

Angel of Death Giclee Print

Angel of Death Giclee Print
Victoria Francés
20 in. x 28 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

angel of death art print, fantasy posters, fantasy art prints, figurative art prints, gothic art prints, victoria frances artworks

Steez - Take Aim

Steez – Take Aim
Steez
36 in. x 24 in.
Buy This at Allposters.com

take aim art print, steez art prints, women and weapons, gun posters, figurative art prints, decorative art prints, best sellers, military women posters

Page 1 of 1812345...10...Last »